VolumeVol. 53 • Number No. 3 • July - September 2015 Back

Clinical Trials

Safety and Tolerability Assessment of Insulin Glulisine as Part of an Insulin Regimen in the Management of Filipino Diabetics

Authors: Araceli A. Panelo, Maria Pamela S. Chua, Marievi A. Lelis, Pauline Joy A. Pastor, Raymond V. Oliva

DOI: 10.65564/pjim.147e2e9a98

Date of Publication: September 2015


Abstract

Background: Insulin glulisine is a new rapid-acting insulin analogue. Currently, few data are available on its safety and tolerability among patients in the Asia-Pacific region.

Objectives:

Primary Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of insulin glulisine as part of an insulin treatment regimen in Filipinos with diabetes

Secondary Objectives:

1. To compare the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG) and post-prandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels at baseline and after three and six months on an insulin treatment regimen with insulin glulisine

2. To measure patients’ level of satisfaction in using the Insulin glulisine pen

Methods: This was a multicenter, observational, post-marketing surveillance study of adult patients (18 to <75 years old) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus who were prescribed with insulin glulisine as part of their diabetes treatment regimen, and signed a data release consent form. Patients who were pregnant and had known allergy to insulin glulisine and any of its excipients were excluded. Patients were followed up for treatment duration of six months inclusive of a baseline visit and two follow up evaluations falling at third month and sixth months of treatment. The incidence of hypoglycemia and other adverse events was determined. Changes in baseline levels of HbA1c, FBG and PPBG were measured during follow-up visits at third and sixth months. Patient satisfaction with the Insulin glulisine pen was quantified using a five-point scale questionnaire.

Results: Among 1,805 patients included, 132 (7.31%) experienced hypoglycemia. The overall incidence of adverse events other than hypoglycemia was 0.78%. There was a significant reduction in baseline levels of HbA1c, FBG and PPBG during the follow-up visits at third and sixth months (all p<0.0001). Patient satisfaction with using the pen was good to excellent.

Conclusion: This post-marketing surveillance study demonstrates the safety and tolerability of insulin glulisine when used as part of an insulin regimen in an actual clinical setting for the management of diabetes among Filipino patients. Insulin glulisine as part of a diabetes treatment regimen was effective in improving glycemic parameters. The glulisine pen was also well tolerated and accepted by patients.

Trial Registration Number: APIDR_L_03772

Keywords: insulin glulisine, diabetes mellitus, safety, hypoglycemia


References

  1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B; American Diabetes Association; European Association for Study of Diabetes. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:193-203.
  2. Monnier L, Colette C. Addition of rapid-acting insulin to basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: indications and modalities. Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:7-13.
  3. Rosenstock J, Riddle MC. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. In: Cefalu WT, Gerish JE, LeRoith D, eds. The CADRE handbook of diabetes management. New York: Medical Information Press; 2004:145-168.
  4. Jimeno CA, Sobrepeña LM, Mirasol RC. DiabCare 2008: Survey on glycaemic control and the status of diabetes care and complications among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Philippines. Philipp J Intern Med. 2012;0:15-22.
  5. Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1245- 1249.
  6. Ampudia-Blasco JF, Rossetti P, Ascaso JF. Basal plus basal-bolus approach in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes TechnolTher. 2011;(13 Suppl 1):S75-83.
  7. Owens DR, Luzio SD, Sert-Langeron C, Riddle MC. Effects of initiation and titration of a single pre-prandial dose of insulin glulisine while continuing titrated insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a 6-month ‘proof-of-concept’ study. Diabetes ObesMetab. 2011;13:1020-1027.
  8. Choe EY, Lee YH, Lee BW, Kang ES, Cha BS, Lee HC. GlycemicEffects of Once-a-Day Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogue Addition on a Basal Insulin Analogue in Korean Subjects with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2012;36:230-236.
  9. Lankisch MR, Ferlinz KC, Leahy JL, Scherbaum WA; Orals PlusApidra and LANTUS (OPAL) study group. Introducing a simplified approach to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of two single-dose regimens of insulin glulisine plus insulin glargine and oral antidiabeticdrugs. Diabetes ObesMetab. 2008;10:1178-1185.
  10. Fritsche A, Larbig M, Owens D, Häring HU; GINGER study group. Comparison between a basal-bolus and a premixed insulin regimen in individuals with type 2 diabetes-results of the GINGER study. Diabetes ObesMetab. 2010;12:115-123.
  11. Dreyer M, Prager R, Robinson A, Busch K, Ellis G, Souhami E, Van Leendert R. Efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine in patients with type 1 diabetes. HormMetab Res. 2005;37:702-707.
  12. Meyer C, Boron A, Plummer E, Voltchenok M, Vedda R. Glulisine Versus Human Regular Insulin in Combination With Glargine in Noncritically Ill Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010:33;2496-2501.
  13. Yamada S. Insulin glulisine in the management of diabetes. Dove Press Journal: Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy 2009:2;111–115.
  14. van Bon AC, Bode BW, Sert-Langeron C, DeVries JH, Charpentier G. Insulin glulisine compared to insulin aspart and to insulin lispro administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes TechnolTher. 2011;13:607-614.
  15. Morello CM. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin analogues in special populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:827-835.
  16. Daily G, Rosenstock J, Moses RG, Ways K. Insulin glulisine provides improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2363-2368.
  17. Malone JK, Kerr LF, Campaigne BN, Sachson RA, Holcombe JH. Lispro Mixture-Glargine Study Group. Combined therapy with insulin lispro Mix 75/25 plus metformin or insulin glargine plus metformin: a 16- week, randomized, open-label, crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes beginning insulin therapy. ClinTher. 2004;26:2034-2044.
  18. Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P, Lewin A, Gabbay RA, Hu P, Bode B, Garber A. INITIATE Study Group. Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogues. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:260-265.
  19. Hancu N, Czupryniak L, Genestin E, Sourij H. A Pan- European and Canadian prospective survey to evaluate patient satisfaction with the SoloSTAR insulin injection device in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:1224-1234.
  20. Carter J, Roberts A. Usability of a pre-filled insulin injection device in a 3-month observational survey of everyday clinical practice in Australia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:2741-2749