VolumeVol. 58 • Number No. 4 • October-December 2020 Back

Original Article

​​​​​​​Physician Empathy in Public and Private Internal Medicine Residency Training Programs in Pasig City

Authors: Melody Hope L. Lee Yu, Rafael Carlos C. Aniceto, Dave Ryan A. Dela Cruz, Mary Stephanie M. Dofitas, Kenneth Brian M. Fernando, Joseph Anthony Lachica

DOI: 10.65564/pjim.15457cc106

Date of Publication: December 2020

Abstract

Research Question: What are the levels of patient-perceived and self-assessed physician empathy among internal medicine (IM) residents in two tertiary hospitals in Pasig City? Is there a significant difference in patient-perceived and self-assessed physician empathy levels between public and private tertiary hospitals?

Background: Empathy is important because it has been speculated to have a positive effect on patient outcomes; it is a skill that can be learned and developed.

Objectives: This study obtained quantitative measurements of patient-perceived and self-assessed physician empathy. Empathy levels between public and private tertiary hospitals were compared.

General Study Design: This study utilized a quantitative cross-sectional design, with surveys as the strategy for data collection.

Participants: 162 out-patient department patients aged 19-75, and 69 IM residents were sampled from one private and one public tertiary hospital.

Outcome Measures: The Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) and the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSE) were used to measure the empathy levels.

Analysis: Sample size calculation was done using OpenEpi. An alpha level of 0.05 was used for computing the independent samples t-test.

Results: Internal Medicine patients from the private hospital rated the physicians with higher empathy scores (mean=31.23) compared to their public hospital counterparts (mean=29.01), which is statistically significant (p=.0134). Residents from the private hospital also scored a higher self-assessed empathy score (mean=110.46) compared to physicians from the public hospital (mean=102.13), which is also statistically significant (p=.0147).

Conclusion: This study provided preliminary information on the empathy levels of physicians in the Philippine setting between private and public hospitals, showing that physician empathy levels are consistently higher in the private hospital facility. The results can help hospitals incorporate or improve training in empathy in internal medicine residency programs, as empathy is known to affect patient health outcomes.

Keywords: physician empathy, residency training, patient care  

Details Download PDF Citation

References

  1. Morse JM, Anderson G, Bottorff JL, Yonge O, O'Brien B, Solberg SM, McIlveen KH. Exploring empathy: a conceptual fit for nursing practice?. Image J Nurs Sch, 24(4): 273-280, 1992.
  2. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med, 86(3):359-364, 2001.
  3. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationships to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry, 159(9):1563-9, 2002.
  4. Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. Patient-Perceived Physician Empathy Scale. PsycTESTS Dataset, 2004.
  5. Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract, 63(606): e76-e84, 2013.
  6. Thomas Jefferson University. [2012]. Physician's empathy directly associated with positive clinical outcomes, a large study of Italian diabetic patients confirms, [online]. ScienceDaily. Available: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120910111708.htm [2019, February 24].
  7. Cassels TG, Chung W, Chan S. The role of culture in affective empathy: Cultural and bicultural differences. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3-4):309-326, 2010.
  8. Chung RCY, Bemak F. The relationship of culture and empathy in cross‐cultural counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(2):154-159, 2002.
  9. Ibrahim FA. Effective cross-cultural counseling and psychotherapy: A framework. SAGE Journals, 13(4), 1985.
  10. Elayyan M, Rankin J, Chaarani MW. Factors affecting empathetic patient care behaviour among medical doctors and nurses: an integrative literature review. EMHJ, 24(3-2018), 2018.
  11. Suh DH, Hong JS, Lee DH, Gonnella JS, Hojat M. The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: A preliminary psychometric study and group. Med Teach, 34: e464–e468, 2012.
  12. Di Lillo M, Cichetti A, Lo Scalzo A, Taroni F, Hojat M. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: a preliminary psychometric study and group comparisons in Italian physicians. Acad Med, 84(9):1198-1202, 2009.
  13. Borracci, RA, Doval HC, Celano L, Ciancio A, Manente D, Calderón JG. Patients' perceptions of Argentine physicians' empathy based on the Jefferson scale of patient's perceptions of physician empathy: Psychometric data and demographic differences. Education for HealthEduc Health (Abingdon), 30(1):19-25, 2017.
  14. Alijanzadeh M, Zare SA, Rajaee R, Fard SM, Asefzadeh S, Alijanzadeh M, Gholami S. Comparison Quality of Health Services between Public and Private Providers: The Iranian People's Perspective. Electron physician, 8(9):2935-2941, 2016.
  15. Siddiqui N, Khandaker SA. Comparison of services of public, private, and foreign hospitals from the perspective of Bangladeshi patients. J Health Popul Nutr, 25(2):221-230, 2007.
  16. Bernardo MO, Cecílio-Fernandes D, Costa P, Quince TA, Costa MJ, Carvalho-Filho MA. Physicians self-assessed empathy levels do not correlate with patients assessments. Plos One, 13(5), 2018.
  17. Mahoney S, Sladek RM, Neild T. A longitudinal study of empathy in pre-clinical and clinical medical students and clinical supervisors. BMC Med Educ, 16(1):270, 2016.
  18. Dayrit MM, Lagrada LP, Picazo OF, Pons MC, Villaverde MC. [2018]. The Philippines Health System Review (Vol. 8), [online]. World Health Organization Regional Office for Southeast Asia. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274579/9789290226734-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [2019, February 25].
  19. American Medical Association. [n.d.]. Internal medicine. Available: https://www.ama-assn.org/specialty/internal-medicine [2019, February 20]
  20. Hojat M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
  21. Tsang M. The Importance of Empathy—As I Have Studied and Experienced It. Hawaii J Med Public Health, 72(9 Suppl 4):79-80, 2013.
  22. Baron-Cohen S. Zero degrees of empathy: A new understanding of cruelty and kindness. London: Allen Lane, 2011.
  23. Jeffrey D. Empathy, sympathy, and compassion in healthcare: Is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 109(12):446-452, 2016.
  24. Davis M. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. New York: Routledge, 2018.
  25. PSA. [2015]. Family Income and Expenditure Survey, [online]. Available: athttps://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/FIES%202015%20Final%20Report.pdf [2019, February 18].
  26. Alyazer Z, Abdulkader R, Jeyashree K, Alselihem A. Patient-rated physicians’ empathy and its determinants in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med, 26(3):199-205, 2019.
  27. Bayne H, Neukrug E, Hays D, Britton B. A comprehensive model for optimizing empathy in person-centered care. Patient Educ Couns, 93(2):209–15, 2013.
  28. Saito I, Imamura T, Miyagi M. Filipino Personality Traits and Values for Social Support: FOW as human resources for work-life balance in Japan (1).
  29. Neumann M, Bensing J, Wirtz M, Wubker A, Scheffer C, Tauschel D, et al. The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: a study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insurance. Patient Educ Couns, 84:208–216, 2011.
  30. Dow AW, Leong D, Anderson A, Wenzel RP. VCU Theater-Medicine Team. Using theater to teach clinical empathy: a pilot study. J Gen Intern Med, 22(8):1114–8, 2007.